![]() ![]() Comment: Right now there are so many junk references that it is difficult to assess notability.WHOIS and twitch statistics sites are just databases. ![]() Websites for his own events are not independent Steam groups, forums and twitter are not reliable. Comment: Not a single one of these references are reliable, independent, or significant coverage.It's often why there can be so many channels on List of most-subscribed YouTube channels without articles, as there are always more media personalities to be covered than there are places that will cover them. Popularity doesn't give notability and is just considered to be a sign that there could be sourcing to establish notability, but large followings by themselves isn't considered notability granting. Dan's article was challenged as it was argued that he wasn't independently notable of GG and it was a bit of a fight for it to be kept despite him also being part of two notable musical groups. PDP didn't pass notability guidelines until a bit after he became the most subscribed channel on YT and up to that point, had his article repeatedly removed. Two great examples of this are PewDiePie and Dan Avidan. Comment: It's insanely hard for online personalities to pass notability guidelines, so much so that even some extremely well known people have either had their articles challenged or outright deleted despite having very large fandoms.You may try again, but you may want to consider the fact that the subject may not be notable (considering the draft has been declined 4 times and the article has been previously deleted 3 separate times.) Thanks, EDG 543 ( message me) 16:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Comment: You have not changed much since last time minus cleaning up the refs but leaving them largely unchanged and adding a section about Mario's Mystery Meat (?) which doesn't really help with the notability.Please avoid resubmitting the article until these issues are resolved. The sources used need to prove that the subject is notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. Large parts of the article remain unsourced or sourced to social media and forums, which are not reliable. Comment: No major improvements since the last decline. ![]() Eternal Shadow Talk 22:11, 28 April 2021 (UTC) ![]() A large portion of the sources are blogs and other unreliable sources.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |